Saturday, May 30, 2020

Health Benefits of Organic Food - Free Essay Example

In the United States, organic food consumption is one of the fastest growing segments of the economy. According to Crinnion (2010), the sales of organic foods have multiplied from $1 to $21.1 million between 1990 and 2008. The increased sales of organic foods are probably brought about by consumers perceiving these foods to be healthier. Additionally, the surge in diseases like cancer and atopic disorders have motivated health professionals, consumers, and policymakers to shift to organic foods as an alternative instead of relying on manufactured food products. Numerous studies from numerous researchers (Batra, Sharma, Gupta, 2014; Crinnion, 2010; Mie Wivstod, 2015; Rembia?‚kowska rednicka, 2009, Forman Silverstein, 2012) have been conducted to evaluate the health benefits of organic foods. Some of the studies illustrate closely related benefits of consuming organic foods, but overall, the results have proven to be insufficient to formulate definite conclusions. The contradiction on whether organic foods have more health benefits than conventional ones forms the basis of this essay. Batra, Sharma, and Gupta (2014) found that even though there is a lack of high-quality scientific evidence to prove the health benefits of organic foods, these foods have nutritional value to the body. The authors argue that organic foods are rich in antioxidants, phosphorous, nitrates, phenolics, and vitamins A, C, and E. Additionally, crops produced via organic farming have been found to have lower amounts of heavy metals, higher levels of vitamin C, iron, and magnesium. Furthermore, Crinnion (2010) discovered that organic foods have twenty-one percent iron and twenty-nine percent more magnesium than non-organic foods. Likewise, organic foods have increased concentration of ascorbic acid, which is an essential vitamin. Mie and Wivstad (2015) provide different opinions regarding the health benefits of organic foods compared to conventional ones. The authors found that organic crops contain twelve percent more vitamins than conventional ones. The results of the study indicated a sixteen percent increase in vitamin C, eleven percent for flavones and flavonols, and eleven percent in other non-defense compounds (Mie Wivstod, 2015). Additionally, Huber, Rembia?‚kowsk, rednick, B gel, and van de Vijver (2011) explored the hypothesis that organic food might increase living organisms capacity towards resilience. In terms of nutritional content, the scholars found that organic foods had less pesticide residues and lower nitrate contents while having higher phenolic compounds and vitamin C levels (in organic plant foods) and higher conjugated linoleic acid and omega-3 fatty acids levels (in milk obtained from animals raised organically). Despite lack of human-based studies, in-vitro models demonstrated higher antimutagenic and antioxidative activity alongside better inhibition of proliferation of cancer cells, while animal models demonstrated positive impacts on growth, weight, the immune system, and fertility indices. In terms of human studies, Huber et al. (2011) report that human epidemiological investigations found an association between organic foods consumption and reduced risks of allergies. However, findings based on human intervention studies remain ambiguous. In a meta-analysis study, Batra et al. (2014) recorded higher levels of total omega three fatty acids, proteins, alpha-Linoleic acid (ALA), vaccenic acid, and docosapentaenoic acid in organic dairy products. Results from a longitudinal KOALA (which is an acronym in Dutch for Child, parents and health: lifestyle and genetic constitution) Birth Cohort study that involved 2700 infants conducted by Mie and Wivstad (2015) indicated that the consumption of o rganic dairy products during pregnancy and infancy resulted in lower risk of eczema at two years of age. Organic milk contains more omega three fatty acids than conventional milk. The authors also found that in Sweden, cows reared using organic foods produced milk that had higher alpha-Linolenic acid (ALA) concentration than conventional milk. The Swedish cows had thirty-eight percent higher content of omega three fatty acids, and in Scania, the cows produced eighty-seven percent higher alpha-Linolenic acid (ALA) compared to conventional milk. Equally important, it is hypothesized that organic foods have more antioxidants than conventional foods. Flavonoid molecules together with carotenoid lycopene are potent antioxidants (Crinnion, 2010). Research indicated that carotenoid lycopene reduces the risk of cancer. Moreover, the anthocyanin in organically grown berries improved neuronal and cognitive brain functions, ocular health, and protect genomic DNA integrity. Rembia?‚kowska and rednicka (2009) found that seventy-two percent of studies indicated high concentrations of polyphenols in organically grown foods in comparison with conventionally produced ones. Polyphenols are a class of plant metabolites with potential antioxidative properties. Flavonols are one of the groups of polyphenols that have been found in organic foods. Flavonols mitigate the incidence of heart diseases, cancer, obesity and allergies, liver diseases, atherosclerosis, and gastrointestinal infections. Additionally, juices from organic welsh onion, Chinese cabbage, and organic spinach have been found to have a fifty to one hundred and twenty percent higher antioxidant activity than juices from conventionally grown vegetables (Rembia?‚kowska, rednicka, 2009). Similarly, Rembia?‚kowska and rednicka (2009) found that organic currants also indicate thirty percent higher antioxidant levels. Mie and Wivtsad (2015) provide research results that contradict the health benefits of organic foods. The authors evaluated a systematic review from 2012 conducted by Smith-Spangler and coworkers. The outcomes of the study indicated that only phosphorous and phenols had higher concentration levels in organic foods. The study had a high statistical heterogeneity that rendered the results inconsistent. The results indicated reporting and publication bias. The overall conclusion is that the published literature lacks substantial evidence to suggest that organic foods are more nutritious than conventional ones. Mie, Andersen, Gunnarsson, Kahl, Kesse-Guyot, Rembia?‚kowska, Quaglio, and Grandjean (2017) argue that current research on organic food consumption and its benefits to human health is scarce. The authors further illustrate the lack of long-term interventional studies that aim to provide the link between good health and organic foods. The lack of biomarkers of exposure, the lack of the evaluation exposure, and the reliance on self-reported data result in measurement errors in the studies. Some reviews have tried to show the relationship between organic food consumption and health, but due to the small sample populations and the short duration of conducting these studies, there arise limited statistical powers and the possibility to determine the long-term effects (Mie et al., 2017). Other studies have shown little significant differences in biomarkers related to health or nutritional status among participants consuming organic and conventional foods. Mie et al. (2017) also compared the results of two studies that investigated the impact of organic and conventional crop farming on cancer cell lines. The results from the organic crops indicated firm anti-proliferative activity against one colon and breast cancer line in comparison to the conventional plants. Other findings showed that juices from organically grown beetroot reduced the levels of apoptosis in gastric cancer cell line. The two studies provided significant differences on the health benefits of organically grown crops against conventional ones. However, what Mie et al. (2017) noted about these surveys is that neither of these studies determined which of the organic or the conventional food product demonstrated preferable biological activity towards improving human health. The authors also confirm that numerous animal studies, especially among rats show how organic foods boost the immune system of the rats. However, Mie et al. (2017) asserts that the relevance of these findings on humans is yet to be concluded with relevant findings. The authors also argue that studies that have been conducted on animals and have provided promising results are yet to be performed on humans; hence, it is necessary to avoid formulating conclusions that claim that organic foods are healthier than conventional ones. Equally important, Mie et al. (2017) further contradict the argument that organic foods have more nutritional value than conventional ones by stating that particular pesticides are utilized for organic farming. The residues of these pesticides are known to have low toxicological effects on the health of human beings; however, evidence suggests that pesticide residues in food increase the prevalence of humans being exposed to diseases. Forman and Silverstein (2012) argue that individuals believe that organic foods are more nutritious than conventional ones yet the research to support this fact is not definitive. A significant number of studies have demonstrated zero differences in carbohydrate, vitamin, and mineral content s between organic and conventional foods. According to the authors, some studies have identified lower nitrate content in organic foods in comparison with conventional ones. Some of the studies that attempt to illustrate the differences and the importance of organic food and conventional ones result in conflicting conclusions For instance, a study conducted by Forman and Silverstein (2012) aimed to determine the nutrient differences between organic and conventional foods demonstrated zero significant differences in nutrient content. As a result, the study failed to deliver substantial differences in nutritional quality of organic and conventional foods. According to the authors, the lack of logical explanations requires further research (Forman, Silverstein, 2012). Other scholars also highlight the themes of insufficient evidence, poor study design, and insignificant differences between organic and conventional foods. For instance, Williamson (2007) notes that few studies have compared health outcomes after consumption of organic or non-organic diets, with the studies ranging from some controlled animal feeding studies alongside a notably small number o f observational human-based studies. From a comparative animal study, only modest evidence demonstrating beneficial effects of organic food is available. Moreover, the small differences in nutrient composition identified are unlikely to influence health outcome differences. Among humans, the few observational studies and lack of large scale, representative studies is further influenced by poor study design and lack of control for compounding lifestyle variables that lead to questions about any beneficial effects from eating organic foods. Meanwhile, after seeking to undertake systematic reviews investigating nutrient content differences and nutrition-related health benefits from organic diets, Dangour, Allen, Lock, and Uauy (2010) are adamant that no evidence exists in favor or organic diets currently. This position arises from the lack of evidence for major nutritional content differences, as well as only 11 out of 92,000 publications being of sufficient scholarly quality in the case of nutrition-related health benefits of organic diets. In another study, Williams (2002) investigated the nutritional quality associated with organic foods, noting that perceived superior quality is leading to heightened consumer preference for organic food products to con ventional foods produced through intensive farming methods. The author highlights the lack of evidence of superiority of organically produced foods owing to the limited number of studies and poor quality study designs. In terms of the available body of evidence, Williams (2002) notes that very few studies have compared nutrient compositions between organic and conventionally produced crop products, with an even fewer number comparing animal products from these two agricultural systems. Moreover, the author observes that evidence of potential impact on animal and human health remains extremely inadequate, while evidence from controlled animal-model studies is significantly limited or poorly designed. Williams (2002) also notes the absence of reports in scholarly literature regarding controlled human-subject intervention studies, while health outcome comparisons between populations habitually consuming organic or conventionally produced foods are largely flawed owing to compounding factors. In terms of the findings of the few available studies, Williams (2002) notes that researchers have reported very few compositional differences beyond the reasonably consistent findings regarding lower vitamin C and higher nitrate content of conventional vegetables. Moreover, in controlled animal models, the author notes that findings have produced conflicting conclusions. In conclusion, many consumers prefer buying organic foods because relevant studies seem to prove that natural foods are more nutritious than conventional ones. However, various research studies have provided different results that argue against the health benefits of organic foods. Studies that show any difference between organic foods and conventional ones fail to offer logical conclusions and recommendations. Some surveys also indicate lower nutrient levels in organic foods when compared with conventional ones. Pesticide residuals are also found in organic foods raising the question of the health benefits of organic foods. In other studies, the researchers end up providing contradicting information that results in conflicting conclusions. Finally, based on evidence from various relevant sources, it is evident that further research with proper funding and with a large sample population researchers will be able to differentiate the nutrient levels and health benefits of organic foods compared with conventional ones. Additionally, such studies will have to be of high quality design to address confounding variables and ensure observations made result from actual effects of differences between organic and conventional food products.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Use of Immorality in Order to Achieve Popular Rule Essay

nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Throughout The Prince and The Discourses of Livy, Niccolo Machiavelli demonstrates multiple theories and advocacies as to why popular rule is important to the success of a state. Popular rule is a term that will be used to define an indirect way to govern the people of a state. In order to rule the masses, a leader must please the people or revolts will occur, causing mayhem and a lack of stability in oneà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s state. During both written works, Machiavelli stresses the importance of obedience and order needed for a state, and especially for a leader to be successful. Machiavelli thoroughly states that anything and everything must be done to keep the peace of the masses, even if acts of immorality are used.†¦show more content†¦In the bigger picture, it is more moral to prevent disorder to a community and keep it obedient and prosperous than to let it fall to disorder and tyranny. Therefore, the acts of immorality that a ruler does to acc omplish this are justifiable means to the more important end of securing power to maintain order. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Machiavelli is a supporter of popular rule, though in an indirect way. Rulers must please their constituents but not give them power. For if the people feel they have power they will rebel against their leader and cause chaos in the state. On page 96 Machiavelli states, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“it is the populace who are responsible for innumerable conflicts and clashes in a republic.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬? Because it is difficult to satisfy the majority without upsetting the minority, people become enraged and protest, causing what the government would consider to be conflicts. That is why it is so important to create a strong government that revolves around a magistrate or council, for people fear being publicly accused of faults, let alone as a threat to public liberty. Machiavelli states that there is no authority more à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“useful and necessaryà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬? for leaders of a government to employ upon their citizens. à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“[Citizens] for fear of being accus ed, dare not attempt to do anything that mightShow MoreRelatedMachiavelli s A Comparison Of Ideals748 Words   |  3 PagesGovernment is the system of rule a state, community, or nation is governed by. This means, A body of people decide to sacrifice some individual rights in order to receive the bxelifits of a larger power. There are two main purposes of government. One, the protection of the people, from outer conflicts and themselves (by enforcing law). Two, to provide public good. Public good being an item or commodity that is available to the entire population without it being lessened buy use. Government also has theRead MoreThe Republic, By Plato2826 Words   |  12 Pagesto rule because they are able to grasp the theory of the forms, which allows them to make rational decisions without being corrupted by the irrational. I am heavily persuaded by Socrates’ stance on the philosopher king, as I too believe that the attainment of true knowledge is the essential foundati on of being an effective ruler; only the forms qualify as true knowledge, therefore solely those who acquire knowledge of the forms, and are necessarily deemed as philosophers, are capable to rule. Read MoreCompromise in the Pre-Civil War Era APUSH DBQ2135 Words   |  9 Pagesï » ¿ Ever since declaring its independence from Britain, America has developed on the foundation of compromise. Upon the drafting of the Constitution, the Founding Fathers were succumbed to compromise in order to incorporate the needs of the different parts of the nation. During the early eighteenth century, Americans achieved reconciliation of political disputes, predominately between the North and the South, through compromise. By 1860 this was no longer feasible and the nation was faced with dishearteningRead MoreBuddhism and the seven dimensions2538 Words   |  11 Pagesdifferent beliefs and values have been formulated with the aim of explaining this age-old question. Most of these beliefs are prevalent today in the form of institutionalised religions. In order to gain an understanding of the word religion, we need to fully analyse and compare the components of religions in order to gain a more cultivated understanding of this enigmatic term. An extremely valuable way of classifying religion and its many aspects is through the Seven Dimensions, developed by NinianRead MoreInformation Technology Does More Goods Than Harms5156 Words   |  21 Pagesconducive background for the emergence of the popular National council of Nigeria and the Cameroons (later Citizens) (NCNC). The idea of the students was to respond to the demands of the time, enhance cultural nationalism and fight the tribalisation of politics which was given a boost by the Richards constitution of 1946.    It is noteworthy that the group was not to harm, maim, kill and destroy as their cohesiveness and absolute allegiance to rules made it become an elite club, only for the cleanestRead More The Morality and Utility of Artificial Intelligence Essay4241 Words   |  17 Pagesimpossible to determine if one thing or another actually thinks, advocates of the consciousness argument would be wise to abandon their argument (53). Turing responds to Lady Lovelace’s contention that a machine â€Å"can do whatever we know how to order it to perform† (qtd Turing 56), with the defense that even humans are unable to produce truly original work. He then proposes that a â€Å"better variant of the objection says that a machine can never ‘take us by surprise’† (56). It seems here that TuringRead MoreSSD2 Module 4 Notes Essay28478 Words   |  114 Pagesfundamentally wrong—abrogation of human rights, for example—may require us to impose our outsiders ethical standards on locals behavior. Read materials from the TRADOC Culture Center (like Smartbooks and online trainings), published ethnographies, and popular media of the area; Ask locals already available to you on the FOB, such as interpreters, or culture experts around you, as well as people you meet on patrols; Look at the behavior of locals in markets, on the roads, in meetings on post; Listen toRead MoreRise of the English Novel5132 Words   |  21 Pagesdramatically. A wide variety of characters and settings began to be used like â€Å"a man on an island, a servant-girl under siege, or a solitary eccentric oddly recapturing his prenatal past† (Longman 3067) Another characteristic of the novel is the use of ordinary names for people instead of symbolic names. For years writers gave characters names that made references to mythology or contained some type of description of the person. Keeping with the idea of representing real life, novelists brokeRead MoreMacbeth9435 Words   |  38 Pages------------------------------------------------- Macbeth From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about Shakespeare s play. For other uses, see  Macbeth (disambiguation). A poster for a  c.  1884 American production ofMacbeth, starring Thomas W. Keene. Depicted, counter clockwise from top-left, are: Macbeth and Banquo meet the  witches; just after the murder ofDuncan; Banquo s ghost; Macbeth duels Macduff; and Macbeth. Macbeth  is a play written by  William Shakespeare. It is consideredRead MoreSolaire Resort and Casino4555 Words   |  19 Pages 8. Conclusion †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 23 9. Reference †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 24 1. Abstract The interesting mixed use Integrated Resort (IR) development model provides various accommodation experiences, sports and entertainment activities, security as well as a lifestyle living experience, it also provides the developers and investors a bright opportunity to attract

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Managing Employee Retention and Turnover Essay Example For Students

Managing Employee Retention and Turnover Essay Managing Employee Retention and TurnoverEmployee retention has always been an important focus for human resource managers. Once a company has invested time and money to recruit and train a good employee, it is in their own best interest to retain that employee, to further develop and motivate him so that he continues to provide value to the organization. But, employers must also recognize and tend to what is in the best interest of their employees, if they intend to keep them. When a company overlooks the needs of its employees and focuses only on the needs of the organization, turnover often results. Excessive turnover in an organization is a prime indicator that something is not right in the employee environment. We will look at the differences between retention and turnover, why employees stay, reasons why they leave, and what can be done to save them. We will also examine some external factors that will make employee retention and turnover reduction highest priorities for human r esource professionals in the twenty-first century. Basically, employee retention is measured by an employees longevity with a company, and is the desired outcome of a company hiring workers it wants and needs. Many organizations find it more productive and profitable to redirect resources formerly allocated to recruiting, hiring, orienting, and training of new employees and use them instead toward employee retention programs. Such programs identify good performers who are likely to leave the company and work proactively to retain them. Although there is no tried-and-true prescription for retaining good employees, there are five factors that have a proven positive impact on retention and they should be taken into consideration when developing an employee retention program:Supervisor/Employee relationship Immediate supervisors who are also leaders of people will be the most important people in the workplace of the future (Jamrog, 2004) Todays supervisor is expected to be a coach, a trainer, and a mentor. Foremost, he must be able to c ommunicate well up and down the organization. Employees who have honest, open relationships with their supervisors feel a sense of commitment to them. Employee engagement The best employees are motivated by tasks that are intellectually stimulating and provide variety and challenge while contributing value. Studies from the Gallup organization show that employees who have an above-average attitude toward their work will generate 38 percent higher customer satisfaction scores, 22 percent higher productivity, and 27 percent higher profits for their companies. Training Employees want to increase their skills, knowledge, and abilities to remain marketable. It gives them a sense of job security. In todays workplace, the more training employees get, the more likely the employer will retain them. According to a 1999 Emerging Workforce Study conducted by Interim Services and Louis Harris and Associates: Among employees who say their company offers poor training, 41 percent plan to leave within a year, versus only 12 percent of those who rate training opportunities as excellent. (Business Week, March 1, 1999)Recognition According to Rog er Herman, chief executive officer of The Herman Group, a management-consulting firm in Greensboro, N.C., you need to show your employees that you appreciate them, that you value their opinionsand show them in a lot of ways. Care and concern for employees on a personal level means more to many employees than compensation. Balance Managements recognition of the importance of personal and family life remains the top driver of employee loyalty. Employees who spend a moderate amount of time each week attending to personal matters while at work have a higher level of commitment to their employer than those who spend no time. (America @ Work 1999, Aon Consulting, Chicago, Illinois; 312.701.4844) Employers who provide a work/life/family balance are more successful in retaining employees. Traditionally, executives have used compensation strategies to solve retention problems, but in todays workplace high pay by itself is not enough to keep employees around. A recent survey by The Society for Human Resource Management ranked tuition reimbursement programs and vacation/holiday time as the top two retention initiatives being offered by employers. In addition, instant recognition programs, such as spot bonuses, are being used to reward excellence in performance as it occurs. Such programs give employees immediate gratification for their efforts rather than delaying it until annual reviews. Also, flexible work hours and telecommuting programs that allow employees to better balance their work commitments with their family duties are becoming more common. According to Ceridian Employer Services (2004), 90 percent of companies with more than 5,000 employees allow telecommuting. And 52 percent of large companies use virtual teams. Organizations must continually search for inn ovative ways to retain their best employees. Fortunately, the costs of these efforts are low in comparison to the high costs of turnover. Turnover of employees can be involuntary or voluntary. When a company lets go of an employee who has been a bad performer, has violated company policy, or broken a law it is usually considered involuntary turnover. So are layoffs. More often we speak of turnover in the context of being voluntary, or the unplanned loss of employees who leave on their own accord, but that the company would prefer to keep. This type of turnover is undesirable. Regardless of type, turnover costs are staggering. The quantitative costs include: hiring a temporary to fill the position or paying overtime to an existing employee, lost productivity, loss on training dollars invested in the employee who left, severance pay and benefits, as well as, advertising, recruiting, hiring, orienting, and training costs to fill the open position. Carl Kutsmode, Principal and founder o f the Tiburon Group, an Internet recruiting solutions consulting firm makes this observation, In many cases, reducing your turnover rate can significantly reduce your total staffing costs by as much as one half. The Journal of Business Strategy, 2003 estimates turnover costs in the United States at $5 trillion annually. There are also intangible costs associated with turnover, such as a drop in employee morale, poor service delivery, and lost customers. Though difficult to quantify, they impact both productivity and profitability. Because employees are inclined to state politically correct reasons for resignation, companies often conduct exit interviews to obtain value feedback. Using human resource personnel to conduct the interview establishes a safe zone for employees to openly share their thoughts. To further encourage communication, questions should be open-ended, prepared in advance, and designed with a purpose. Buhler (2004) recommends including the following questions:What did you most enjoy about your job? What did you least enjoy?What did you like about the management style at the company? What did you dislike?What would you have changed at the company if you had been given the opportunity?Is there anything that would have resulted in your staying with the company?What is your new position providing you differently from your position here?Exit interviews can be used to track trends in turnover that may be rooted in discrimination, improper training, or inadequate pay or benefit programs. Employers can use this information to make appropriate changes or take corrective action, if needed. Exit interviews should always maintain a positive note so that employees realize their feedback is welcome and appreciated, and so their closure with the company is a positive experience. Some employers choose to wait three to six month before conducting exit interviews. These are often done by mail, phone, or online and may take the form of a survey or be outsource d to a third party. The belief is that as time passes, former employees tend to be less hesitant and more objective in their responses. The results from exit interviews only prove valuable if they are used productively within the organization. By examining the core reasons given for turnover, a company can implement strategies to reduce it. These strategies can form the basis for the employee retention program. Christian Timbers, a leading global executive search firm, gives these top ten reasons for why employees leave:Boredom or lack of challengeLimited opportunities for growth and advancement (40% of resignations)Lack of appreciationLow expectations and standards for the positionNoncompetitive compensation packagesInferior or ineffective co-workersLack of leadership or poor supervisionPervasive bureaucracyUnreasonable work hoursCommute or location of company By combining turnover and retention information, a company can see why people leave and what can be done about it. Each of the ten reasons for leaving listed here could be reduced or eliminated with a proactive employee retention program, one that is centered on factors that employees themselves have given as reasons for staying with their employer. Again, these factors stress good supervisory/employee relationships, engage employees in their work, provide training opportunities, recognize and appreciate employees, and offer flexibility and balance in work, life and family duties. By profiling what makes an employee stay, companies can establish proactive retention programs that reduce the number of turnovers. Hamlet as a Comment on Humanity Essay. ReferencesAARP. 2002, Staying Ahead of the Curve: The AARP Work and Career Study. Wahington, D.C.: AARPRetention rodeo. Buhler, Patricia M. The exit interview: a goldmine of informationSource: Supervision v. 63 no4. (Apr. 2002) p. 15-17. Database: WilsonSelectPlus. Ceridian Employee Services, http://www.ceridian.com/myceridianChristian Timbers, www.ctnet.com Frank, Fredric D. The Race for Talent: Retaining and Engaging Workers in the 21st Century. Source: Human Resource Planning v.27 no3 (2004) p. 12-25. Database: WilsonSelectPlus Jamrog, Jay. The Perfect Storm: The Future of Retention and Engagement. Source: Human Resource Planning v. 27 no3 (2004) p. 26-33. Database: WilsonSelectPlus. Society for Human Resource Management (2003). Older Workers Survey. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (2003) Customized Data Compilation, November 20. Demographics and Destiny: Winning the War for Talent, Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Bethesda, Maryland; 301.581.4600http://www.hermangroup.com/retentionconnection/http://www.capitalhgroup.com/weAre/research/KeepingTopTalentSurvey.pdf